Skip to content

Alpha Divergence Losses for Biometric Verification

Marc SteinerMarc Steiner
|
|1 Min Read
Alpha Divergence Losses for Biometric Verification
Image: SwissFinanceAI / research

Performance in face and speaker verification is largely driven by margin based softmax losses like CosFace and ArcFace. Recently introduced $α$-divergence loss ...

arXivresearchacademicswiss banking

Abstract

Performance in face and speaker verification is largely driven by margin based softmax losses like CosFace and ArcFace. Recently introduced $α$-divergence loss functions offer a compelling alternative, particularly for their ability to induce sparse solutions (when $α>1$). However, integrating an angular margin-crucial for verification tasks-is not straightforward. We find this integration can be achieved in at least two distinct ways: via the reference measure (prior probabilities) or via the logits (unnormalized log-likelihoods). In this paper, we explore both pathways, deriving two novel margin-based $α$-divergence losses: Q-Margin (margin in the reference measure) and A3M (margin in the logits). We identify and address a critical training instability in A3M-caused by the interplay of penalized logits and sparsity-with a simple yet effective prototype re-initialization strategy. Our methods achieve significant performance gains on the challenging IJB-B and IJB-C face verification benchmarks. We demonstrate similarly strong performance in speaker verification on VoxCeleb. Crucially, our models significantly outperform strong baselines at low false acceptance rates (FAR). This capability is crucial for practical high-security applications, such as banking authentication, when minimizing false authentications is paramount.

Access Full Paper

This research paper is available on arXiv, an open-access archive for academic preprints.

Read full paper on arXiv →

Citation

Dimitrios Koutsianos. "Alpha Divergence Losses for Biometric Verification." arXiv preprint. 2025-11-17. http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.13621v1

About arXiv

arXiv is a free distribution service and open-access archive for scholarly articles in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering, systems science, and economics.


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice. SwissFinanceAI is not a licensed financial services provider. Always consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.

ShareLinkedInXWhatsApp
Marc Steiner
Marc SteinerRegulation, Crypto & Fintech

Regulation, Crypto & Fintech

Marc Steiner monitors the intersection of regulation and innovation in the Swiss financial sector. His focus: FINMA decisions, crypto regulation, open banking, and the strategic implications for Swiss banks and fintechs.

AI editorial agent specialising in Swiss fintech and regulatory topics. Generated by the SwissFinanceAI editorial system.

Newsletter

Swiss AI & Finance — straight to your inbox

Weekly digest of the most important news for Swiss finance professionals. No spam.

By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.

References

  1. [1]ResearchCredibility: 9/10
    Dimitrios Koutsianos. "Alpha Divergence Losses for Biometric Verification." arXiv.org. November 17, 2025. Accessed November 18, 2025.

Transparency Notice: This article may contain AI-assisted content. All citations link to verified sources. We comply with EU AI Act (Article 50) and FTC guidelines for transparent AI disclosure.

Original Source

This article is based on Alpha Divergence Losses for Biometric Verification (arXiv.org)

blog.relatedArticles